UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
| |
|
|
| ž |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2006
| |
|
|
| o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number: 0-8877
CREDO PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
| Colorado |
|
84-0772991 |
| |
| (State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| |
|
|
| 1801 Broadway, Suite 900,
Denver, Colorado |
|
80202 |
| |
| (Address of principal executive
offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
303-297-2200
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No ž
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
(See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.)
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer ž
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o
No ž
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of
the issuer’s classes of common stock, net of treasury stock, as of the
latest practicable date.
| |
|
|
|
|
| Date |
|
Class |
|
Outstanding |
| |
| March 16, 2006 |
|
Common stock, $.10 par value |
|
9,205,115 |
CREDO PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q For the Period Ended January 31,
2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The terms “CREDO”, “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us”
refer to CREDO Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries unless the
context suggests otherwise.
2
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CREDO PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
January 31, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
| |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
3,155,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,935,000 |
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
5,706,000 |
|
|
|
5,495,000 |
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued oil and gas sales
|
|
|
2,354,000 |
|
|
|
2,776,000 |
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
1,705,000 |
|
|
|
1,003,000 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
233,000 |
|
|
|
245,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
13,153,000 |
|
|
|
11,454,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, at cost, using full cost method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unevaluated oil and gas properties
|
|
|
4,339,000 |
|
|
|
3,452,000 |
|
|
Evaluated oil and gas properties
|
|
|
38,599,000 |
|
|
|
36,121,000 |
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization of
oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(15,730,000 |
) |
|
|
(15,022,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and gas properties, at cost, using full cost method
|
|
|
27,208,000 |
|
|
|
24,551,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive license agreement, net of amortization of $379,000 in
2006 and $361,000 in 2005
|
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
|
338,000 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,097,000 |
|
|
|
1,288,000 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
213,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
41,998,000 |
|
|
$ |
37,844,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
4,769,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,426,000 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
|
331,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
5,189,000 |
|
|
|
3,757,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
6,395,000 |
|
|
|
5,978,000 |
|
|
Exclusive license obligation, less current obligations of
$64,000 in 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
233,000 |
|
|
|
233,000 |
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
901,000 |
|
|
|
929,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
12,718,000 |
|
|
|
10,897,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none
issued
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Common stock, $.10 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized,
9,510,000 shares issued in 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
951,000 |
|
|
|
951,000 |
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
14,140,000 |
|
|
|
13,933,000 |
|
|
Treasury stock, 347,000 shares in 2006 and 393,000 in 2005
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(306,000 |
) |
|
Retained earnings, net of $6,272,000 related to 20% stock
dividend in 2003
|
|
|
14,189,000 |
|
|
|
12,494,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
29,280,000 |
|
|
|
26,947,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
41,998,000 |
|
|
$ |
37,844,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
3
CREDO PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
| |
|
January
31, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales
|
|
$ |
4,120,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,385,000 |
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
173,000 |
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
Investment income and other
|
|
|
245,000 |
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,538,000 |
|
|
|
2,606,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas production
|
|
|
1,004,000 |
|
|
|
488,000 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
738,000 |
|
|
|
477,000 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
433,000 |
|
|
|
443,000 |
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,184,000 |
|
|
|
1,417,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
2,354,000 |
|
|
|
1,189,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(659,000 |
) |
|
|
(333,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$ |
1,695,000 |
|
|
$ |
856,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK BASIC
|
|
$ |
.19 |
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK DILUTED
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
9,137,000 |
|
|
|
9,056,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
9,475,000 |
|
|
|
9,249,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
4
CREDO PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended January 31, 2006
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital In |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
| |
|
Common
Stock |
|
|
Excess Of |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders’ |
|
| |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Par
Value |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income
(Loss) |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2005
|
|
|
9,510,000 |
|
|
$ |
951,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,933,000 |
|
|
$ |
(125,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(306,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,494,000 |
|
|
$ |
26,947,000 |
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
1,695,000 |
|
|
|
1,695,000 |
|
|
|
1,695,000 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
306,000 |
|
|
|
306,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
306,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
2,001,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
147,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
272,000 |
|
|
Compensation expense associated with unvested portion of
previously granted stock options
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 31, 2006
|
|
|
9,510,000 |
|
|
$ |
951,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,140,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,189,000 |
|
|
$ |
29,280,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
5
CREDO PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
| |
|
January
31, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,695,000 |
|
|
$ |
856,000 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
738,000 |
|
|
|
477,000 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
417,000 |
|
|
|
385,000 |
|
|
Compensation expense related to stock options granted
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term investments
|
|
|
193,000 |
|
|
|
1,317,000 |
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
|
|
(404,000 |
) |
|
|
(354,000 |
) |
|
Accrued oil and gas sales
|
|
|
422,000 |
|
|
|
363,000 |
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
(702,000 |
) |
|
|
221,000 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
318,000 |
|
|
|
(192,000 |
) |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,343,000 |
|
|
|
(102,000 |
) |
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
4,169,000 |
|
|
|
3,042,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(3,539,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,343,000 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
146,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Changes in other long-term assets
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
(34,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(3,221,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,377,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
272,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
272,000 |
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
1,220,000 |
|
|
|
657,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
1,935,000 |
|
|
|
518,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$ |
3,155,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
|
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
6
CREDO PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
January 31, 2006
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles
for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by U. S. generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements contain all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered
necessary for a fair presentation of the company’s results for the
periods presented. These consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2005.
The company effected a three-for-two stock split in the third fiscal
quarter of 2005. All share and per share amounts discussed and disclosed
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect the effect of that stock
split.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. The company bases its estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions it believes to
be reasonable under the circumstances. Although actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, the
company believes that its estimates are reasonable and that actual results
will not vary significantly from the estimated amounts.
3. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The company currently has one stock-based employee compensation plan,
which is described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in
the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,
2005. Prior to November 1, 2005, the company accounted for this plan
under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles
Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees , and related interpretations, as permitted by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation . No stock-based employee compensation
expense was recognized in the company’s Consolidated Statement of
Operations prior to November 1, 2005, as all options granted under
the company’s stock-based compensation plan had an exercise price equal
to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Effective November 1, 2005, the company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (R), Share Based Payment ,
using the modified-retrospective-transition method. Under this transition
method, the company restated the results of all prior periods back to the
beginning of fiscal 1997 (the fiscal year of inception for this
stock-based compensation plan) in accordance with the original provisions
of SFAS No. 123. The cumulative effect of this restatement was an
increase of $1,447,000 to capital in excess of par value and a decrease to
retained earnings in the same amount. For the three months ended January 31,
2006 and 2005, the company recognized compensation expense related to its
stock option plan of $60,000 and $53,000, respectively. The company has
not made any option grants during fiscal 2006. If option grants are made
in the future, compensation expense for all such share-based payments
granted, based upon the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) will also be included in
compensation expense.
7
4. NATURAL GAS PRICE HEDGING
The company periodically hedges the price of a portion of its estimated
natural gas production when the potential for significant downward price
movement is anticipated. Hedging transactions typically take the form of
forward short positions and collars on the NYMEX futures market, and are
closed by purchasing offsetting positions. Such hedges, which are
accounted for as cash flow hedges, do not exceed estimated production
volumes, are expected to have reasonable correlation between price
movements in the futures market and the cash markets where the company’s
production is located, and are authorized by the company’s Board of
Directors. Hedges are expected to be closed as related production occurs
but may be closed earlier if the anticipated downward price movement
occurs or if the company believes that the potential for such movement has
abated.
The company recognizes all derivatives (consisting solely of cash flow
hedges) on the balance sheet at fair value at the end of each period.
Changes in the fair value of a cash flow hedge are recorded in
Stockholders’ Equity as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets and then are reclassified into the
Consolidated Statement of Operations as the underlying hedged item affects
earnings. Amounts reclassified into earnings related to natural gas hedges
are included in oil and gas sales.
Hedging gains and losses are recognized as adjustments to gas sales as the
hedged product is produced. The company had after tax hedging losses of
$191,000 in the first fiscal quarter of 2006 and after tax hedging losses
of $163,000 for the same period in 2005. Any hedge ineffectiveness, which
was not material for the first fiscal quarter of 2006, is immediately
recognized in gas sales. The company currently has no open hedge
positions.
The company has a hedging line of credit with its bank which is available,
at the discretion of the company, to meet margin calls. To date, the
company has not used this facility and maintains it only as a precaution
related to possible margin calls. The maximum credit line is $2,000,000
with interest calculated at the prime rate. The facility is unsecured and
requires the company to maintain $3,000,000 in cash or short term
investments and prohibits unfunded debt in excess of $500,000. It expires
on October 31, 2006.
8
5. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period except
those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.
The components of comprehensive income for the three months ended January 31,
2006 and 2005 are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
| |
|
January
31, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,695,000 |
|
|
$ |
856,000 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
606,000 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(119,000 |
) |
|
|
(177,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
2,001,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,285,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The company’s calculation of earnings per share of common stock is as
follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three
Months Ended January 31, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
| |
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
| |
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per
Share |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per
Share |
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
1,695,000 |
|
|
|
9,137,000 |
|
|
$ |
.19 |
|
|
$ |
856,000 |
|
|
|
9,056,000 |
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive shares of common stock from stock options
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
338,000 |
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
193,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
1,695,000 |
|
|
|
9,475,000 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
856,000 |
|
|
|
9,249,000 |
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. INCOME TAXES
The company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred
income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of
assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets or liabilities at the end of
each period are determined using the tax rate in effect at that time.
The total future deferred income tax liability is extremely complicated
for any energy company to estimate due in part to the long-lived nature of
depleting oil and gas reserves and variables such as product prices.
Accordingly, the liability is subject to continual recalculation, revision
of the numerous estimates required, and may change significantly in the
event of such things as major acquisitions, divestitures, product price
changes, changes in reserve estimates, changes in reserve lives, and
changes in tax rates or tax laws.
9
8. COMMITMENTS
Effective January 1, 2005, the company entered into an exploration
agreement to generate and market gas drilling prospects in South Texas.
The company is currently committed to spend $1,900,000 over two years
primarily for seismic, leases and administrative costs. Through January 31,
2006, the company has made payments of $1,470,000 towards this commitment.
In general, all costs incurred by the company are allocated over a number
of prospects, and payout is calculated on a prospect by prospect basis
based on recovery of the cost allocated to each prospect. The company owns
75% of each generated prospect before payout and 37.5% after payout. The
company has the option to participate in each prospect for all, or a
portion, of its interest. If the company does not participate for the full
interest, the remaining amount will be sold to industry participants on a
promoted basis. Drilling of generated prospects is not covered by the
agreement. The company’s drilling cost, if any, will depend upon its
election to participate with, or sell, all or a portion of its interest in
any prospect generated.
In April 2005, the company committed approximately $1,200,000 over an
expected two-year period to purchase a 30% interest in 18,000 gross acres
along the Central Kansas Uplift, in Graham and Sheridan counties, Kansas,
participate in a 3-D seismic survey, and drill five exploratory wells.
Through January 31, 2006, the company has made payments of $700,000
towards this commitment. Subsequent drilling will be determined by results
from the initial wells. Approximately 28 square miles of proprietary 3-D
seismic will be shot to define Lansing-Kansas City oil prospects at about
4,000 feet.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes certain statements that may be
deemed to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than statements of
historical facts, address matters that the company reasonably expects,
believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future. Forward-looking
statements may relate to, among other things:
| |
• |
|
the company’s future financial position, including working
capital and anticipated cash flow; |
| |
| |
• |
|
amounts and nature of future capital expenditures; |
| |
| |
• |
|
operating costs and other expenses; |
| |
| |
• |
|
wells to be drilled or reworked; |
| |
| |
• |
|
oil and natural gas prices and demand; |
| |
| |
• |
|
existing fields, wells and prospects; |
| |
| |
• |
|
diversification of exploration; |
| |
| |
• |
|
estimates of proved oil and natural gas reserves; |
| |
| |
• |
|
reserve potential; |
| |
| |
• |
|
development and drilling potential; |
| |
| |
• |
|
expansion and other development trends in the oil and natural
gas industry; |
| |
| |
• |
|
the company’s business strategy; |
| |
| |
• |
|
production of oil and natural gas; |
| |
| |
• |
|
matters related to the Calliope Gas Recovery System; |
| |
| |
• |
|
effects of federal, state and local regulation; |
| |
| |
• |
|
insurance coverage; |
| |
| |
• |
|
employee relations; |
| |
| |
• |
|
investment strategy and risk; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
expansion and growth of the company’s business and operations. |
10
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At January 31, 2006, working capital was $7,964,000, compared to
$6,305,000 at January 31, 2005. For the three months ended January 31,
2006, net cash provided by operating activities increased $1,127,000, or
37% to $4,169,000 when compared to net cash provided by operating
activities of $3,042,000 for the same period in 2005. This increase is
primarily the result of increases in net income and other non-cash items
of $1,109,000; a net increase of $211,000 in short term investments in
2006 versus a net decrease in short term investments of $963,000 in 2005
which resulted in a net decrease in cash provided by operating activities
of $1,174,000 between the two periods; a net decrease in cash provided by
operating activities as a result of changes in accrued oil and gas sales,
trade receivables and other current assets of $354,000; and a net increase
in cash provided by operating activities as a result of changes in
accounts payable and income taxes payable of $1,546,000. For the three
months ended January 31, 2006 and 2005, net cash used in investing
activities was $3,221,000 and $2,377,000, respectively. Investing
activities primarily included oil and gas exploration and development
expenditures, including Calliope, totaling $3,539,000 and $2,343,000,
respectively.
The average return on the company’s investments for the three months
ended January 31, 2006 and 2005 was 3.2% and 1.0%, respectively. At
January 31, 2006, approximately 55% of the investments were directly
invested in mutual funds and were managed by professional money managers.
Remaining investments are in managed partnerships that use various
strategies to minimize their correlation to stock market movements. Most
of the investments are highly liquid and the company believes they
represent a responsible approach to cash management. In the company’s
opinion, the greatest investment risk is the potential for negative market
impact from unexpected, major adverse news.
Existing working capital and anticipated cash flow are expected to be
sufficient to fund operations and capital commitments for at least the
next 12 months. As discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial
statements, at January 31, 2006 the company had remaining commitments
of $930,000 related to projects in South Texas and along the Central
Kansas uplift. Such costs, which include overhead, lease bonuses, land
services and 3-D seismic, are expected to be funded over the next 9 to 12 months.
At January 31, 2006, the company had no lines of credit or other bank
financing arrangements except for the hedging line of credit discussed in
Note 4. Because earnings are anticipated to be reinvested in operations,
cash dividends are not expected to be paid. The company has no defined
benefit plans and no obligations for post retirement employee benefits.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCING
The company has no off-balance sheet financing arrangements at January 31,
2006.
PRODUCT PRICES AND PRODUCTION
Although product prices are key to the company’s ability to operate
profitably and to budget capital expenditures, they are beyond the
company’s control and are difficult to predict. Since 1991, the company
has periodically hedged the price of a portion of its estimated natural
gas production when the potential for significant downward price movement
is anticipated. Hedging transactions typically take the form of forward
short positions and collars on the NYMEX futures market, and are closed by
purchasing offsetting positions. Such hedges, which are accounted for as
cash flow hedges, do not exceed estimated production volumes, are expected
to have reasonable correlation between price movements in the futures
market and the cash markets where the company’s production is located,
and are authorized by the company’s Board of Directors. Hedges are
expected to be closed as related production occurs but may be closed
earlier if the anticipated downward price movement occurs or if the
company believes that the potential for such movement has abated. Refer to
Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion
on the company’s hedging activities.
11
Gas and oil sales volume and price realization comparisons for the
indicated periods are set forth below. Price realizations include the
sales price and hedging losses.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three
Months Ended January 31, |
| |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
%
Change |
| Product |
|
Volume |
|
Price |
|
Volume |
|
Price |
|
Volume |
|
Price |
|
Gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
437,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.19 |
(1) |
|
|
382,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.25 |
(2) |
|
|
+14 |
% |
|
|
+56 |
% |
|
Oil (bbls)
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
$ |
56.94 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
$ |
42.67 |
|
|
|
+7 |
% |
|
|
+33 |
% |
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
Includes $0.61 Mcf hedging loss. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Includes $0.59 Mcf hedging loss. |
OPERATIONS
During the first fiscal quarter the company continued to focus on its two
core projects — natural gas drilling and application of its patented
Calliope Gas Recovery System.
During fiscal 2005, the company expanded into South Texas through an
exploration program using 3-D seismic to define the Vicksburg, Frio, Queen
and Wilcox prospects in Hidalgo and Jim Hogg counties and into
north-central Kansas through an exploration program using 3-D seismic to
define Lansing-Kansas City oil prospects in Graham and Sheridan counties.
The company believes that, in combination, its drilling and Calliope
projects provide an excellent (and possibly unique) balance for achieving
its goal of adding long-lived natural gas reserves and production at
reasonable costs and risks.
The company will continue to actively pursue adding reserves through its
two core projects in fiscal 2006 and expects these activities to be a
reliable source of reserve additions. However, the timing and extent of
such activities can be dependent on many factors which are beyond the
company’s control, including but not limited to, the availability of oil
field services such as drilling rigs, production equipment and related
services and access to wells for application of the company’s patented
liquid lift system on low pressure gas wells. The prevailing price of oil
and natural gas has a significant affect on demand and, thus, the related
cost of such services and wells.
The company is currently experiencing delays in securing drilling rigs and
for the delivery of production equipment, primarily compressors and coil
tubing. These delays are extending the time it takes the company to
conduct its field operations. As a result, the company could be at risk
for price increases related to these types of services and equipment.
Drilling Activities. The company currently drills primarily
on its 60,000 gross acre inventory located along the northern shelf of the
Anadarko Basin. Drilling expenditures were concentrated on the company’s
acreage inventory located along the northern shelf of the Anadarko Basin
of Oklahoma. The wells targeted the Morrow, Oswego and Chester formations
between 7,000 and 10,000 feet. A substantial number of additional wells
are anticipated for the area.
Drilling is not restricted to the northern Anadarko shelf acreage. The
company is generating prospects elsewhere in the Northern Anadarko Basin,
in the Oklahoma Panhandle, north-central Oklahoma, north-central Kansas
and South Texas.
In the first quarter of 2006, a series of six wells were drilled in Harper
and Ellis Counties, Oklahoma. Three were dry holes and the other three
were completed for production in February 2006. The three new
producers
are located on the company’s 5,120 gross acre Glacier Prospect, the
2,560 gross acre Buffalo Creek Prospect, and the 1,280 gross acre Gage
Prospect. The company has working interests ranging from 31% to 57% in
these wells. The next round of drilling is expected to begin in May 2006
with three to six wells.
During fiscal 2005, the company significantly expanded both the volume and
breadth of its exploration program with new projects in South Texas and
north-central Kansas. It is the company’s intention to diversify its
exploration geographically, scientifically, and in terms of capital, risk
and reserve potential. Compared to drilling in Oklahoma, the South Texas
project involves higher costs and greater risks but significantly higher
per well reserve potential. The north-central Kansas project is geared to
oil exploration and has excellent potential to add significant reserves at
moderate costs and risks. Both projects are in areas where 3-D seismic is
a proven exploration tool and where continuing refinements are providing
excellent exploration success. Equally as important, both exploration
teams specialize in their respective geographic areas and have been highly
successful finding new reserves using 3-D seismic.
As previously discussed, drilling of generated South Texas prospects is
not covered by the exploration agreement and, therefore, is not a capital
requirement under the exploration agreement. Drilling is expected to
commence in mid-2006. The initial four well drilling program will be
located in Hidalgo and Jim Hogg Counties and wells will range in depth
from 10,200 to 15,500 feet with an estimated total cost (8\8ths basis) for
all four wells of approximately $14,000,000. Completed costs for
individual wells are estimated to range from $1,500,000 at 10,200 feet to
$6,500,000 at 15,500 feet. The company is currently evaluating what
portion of its 37.5% after payout interest to retain for direct
participation.
The north-central Kansas project agreement provides for approximately 28
square miles of 3-D seismic to be collected and evaluated and five
exploratory wells to be drilled. Completed costs for individual wells are
estimated to be approximately $280,000. Drilling will commence after new
3-D seismic shooting and interpretation is completed, which is expected in
mid-2006.
All of the company’s oil and natural gas properties are located on-shore
in the continental United States. The company’s future drilling
activities may not be successful, and its overall drilling success rate
may change. Unsuccessful drilling activities could have a material adverse
effect on the company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Also, the company may not be able to obtain the right to drill in areas
where it believes there is significant potential for the company.
Calliope Gas Recovery Technology. The company owns the
exclusive right to a patented technology known as the Calliope Gas
Recovery System. Calliope can achieve substantially lower flowing bottom
hole pressure than conventional production methods because it does not
rely on reservoir pressure to lift liquids. Lower bottom hole pressure can
translate into recovery of substantial additional natural gas reserves.
Calliope has proven to be reliable and flexible over a wide range of
applications on wells the company owns and operates. It has also proven to
be consistently successful. Accordingly, the company has recently begun
implementing strategies designed to widen the envelope of wells on which
Calliope should be installed.
Realizing Calliope’s value continues to be a top priority of the
company. The company is focused on three fronts to increase the number of
Calliope installations: expanding the geographic region for purchasing
Calliope candidate wells from third parties, joint ventures with larger
companies, and drilling wells into low-pressure gas reservoirs for the
purpose of using Calliope to recover stranded natural gas reserves.
Higher natural gas prices have facilitated a new project to drill wells
into low-pressure natural gas reservoirs. Many low-pressure reservoirs,
including abandoned fields, contain substantial stranded natural gas that
can be recovered by Calliope. This project is designed to ramp-up the
number of Calliope installations, improve the company’s control over
monetizing Calliope’s value, control configuration of wellbores for
optimum Calliope performance, and broaden the range of reservoirs for
Calliope applications. Completed well costs are estimated to be
approximately $2,200,000 including installation of Calliope. The company
expects tocommence drilling wells for Calliope applications in mid-2006 and is
considering bringing in industry participants for the project.
As previously reported, joint venture presentations have been made to a
range of companies, including several of the major oil and gas companies
as well as several large independents. All of these companies have
expressed a keen interest in Calliope, and joint venture discussions are
continuing with several of those companies, including evaluation of
candidate wells.
In addition to joint ventures and the Calliope drilling project, the
company has successfully expanded its Calliope operations into Texas and
Louisiana. In southwest Texas, the company recently completed two
prototype Calliope installations which once again broadened Calliope’s
down-hole application, successfully lifting several times more fluid
volume than Calliope has previously lifted from the company’s Oklahoma
wells. Although this prototype Calliope configuration limits the amount of
natural gas that can be produced during the start-up and dewatering phase,
after initial dewatering and once liquid production stabilizes, the system
can be optimized to allow greater natural gas flow. The company currently
has three Calliope candidate wells that are awaiting Calliope
installations, one in Louisiana and two in Oklahoma. If the company
experiences no significant procurement delays, it expects that the
installations will be complete in the company’s second fiscal quarter.
These efforts are being spearheaded on a full-time basis by a highly
qualified petroleum engineer based in Houston.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended January 31, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended
January 31, 2005
For the three months ended January 31, 2006, total revenues increased
74% to $4,538,000 compared to $2,606,000 during the same period last year.
As the oil and gas price/volume table on page 12 shows, total gas price
realizations, which reflect hedging transactions, increased 56% to $8.19
per Mcf and oil price realizations increased 33% to $56.94 per barrel. The
net effect of these price changes was to increase oil and gas sales by
$1,249,000. For the three months ended January 31, 2006, the
company’s gas equivalent production increased 13% resulting in an oil
and gas sales increase of $486,000. Operating income rose 9% due to
drilling and production supervision income related to operated wells.
Investment and other income increased $183,000 primarily due to the
performance of the company’s investments.
For the three months ended January 31, 2006, total costs and expenses
rose 54% to $2,184,000 compared to $1,417,000 for the comparable period in
2005. Oil and gas production expenses increased 106% due primarily to an
increase in production taxes and lease operating expense. Production taxes
increased during the current period primarily due to the company’s
receipt of a production tax rebate during the 2005 period. The increase in
lease operating expense is primarily due to an increase in the number of
wells owned by the company and from additional workover expenses during
the 2006 period. Depreciation, depletion and amortization rose 55%
primarily due to an increase in the amortizable full cost pool and
increased production. General and administrative expenses decreased 2%.
Interest expense relates to the exclusive license agreement note payment.
The effective tax rate was 28% for the 2006 and 2005 periods.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The company believes the following accounting policies and estimates are
critical in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements: the
carrying value of its oil and natural gas properties, the accounting for
oil and gas reserves, and the estimate of its asset retirement
obligations.
OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES. The company uses the full cost
method of accounting for costs related to its oil and natural gas
properties. Capitalized costs included in the full cost pool are depleted
on an aggregate basis using the units-of-production method. Depreciation,
depletion and amortization is a significant component of oil and natural gas properties. A change in proved reserves
without a corresponding change in capitalized costs will cause the
depletion rate to increase or decrease.
Both the volume of proved reserves and any estimated future expenditures
used for the depletion calculation are based on estimates such as those
described under “Oil and Gas Reserves” below.
The capitalized costs in the full cost pool are subject to a quarterly
ceiling test that limits such pooled costs to the aggregate of the present
value of future net revenues attributable to proved oil and natural gas
reserves discounted at 10 percent plus the lower of cost or market
value of unproved properties less any associated tax effects. If such
capitalized costs exceed the ceiling, the company will record a write-down
to the extent of such excess as a non-cash charge to earnings. Any such
write-down will reduce earnings in the period of occurrence and result in
lower depreciation and depletion in future periods. A write-down may not
be reversed in future periods, even though higher oil and natural gas
prices may subsequently increase the ceiling.
The company has made only one ceiling write-down in its 28-year history.
That write down was made in 1986 after oil prices fell 51% and natural gas
prices fell 45% between fiscal year end 1985 and 1986.
Changes in oil and natural gas prices have historically had the most
significant impact on the company’s ceiling test. In general, the
ceiling is lower when prices are lower. Even though oil and natural gas
prices can be highly volatile over weeks and even days, the ceiling
calculation dictates that prices in effect as of the last day of the test
period be used and held constant. The resulting valuation is a snapshot as
of that day and, thus, is generally not indicative of a true fair value
that would be placed on the company’s reserves by the company or by an
independent third party. Therefore, the future net revenues associated
with the estimated proved reserves are not based on the company’s
assessment of future prices or costs, but rather are based on prices and
costs in effect as of the end the test period.
OIL AND GAS RESERVES. The determination of depreciation and
depletion expense as well as ceiling test write-downs related to the
recorded value of the company’s oil and natural gas properties are
highly dependent on the estimates of the proved oil and natural gas
reserves. Oil and natural gas reserves include proved reserves that
represent estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas which
geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to
be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing
economic and operating conditions. There are numerous uncertainties
inherent in estimating oil and natural gas reserves and their values,
including many factors beyond the company’s control. Accordingly,
reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and
natural gas ultimately recovered and the corresponding lifting costs
associated with the recovery of these reserves.
At October 31, 2005, the date of the company’s most recent reserve
report, the company’s reserves, and reserve values, were concentrated in
54 properties (“Significant Properties”). Some of the Significant
Properties were individual wells and others were multi-well properties.
The Significant Properties represented 28% of the company’s total
properties but a disproportionate 76% of the discounted value (at 10%) of
the company’s reserves. Individual wells on which the company’s
patented liquid lift system is installed comprise 22% of the Significant
Properties and represented 32% of the discounted reserve value of such
properties. Relatively new wells comprised 22% of the Significant
Properties and represented 24% of the discounted value of such properties.
Estimates of reserve quantities and values for certain Significant
Properties must be viewed as being subject to significant change as more
data about the properties becomes available. Such properties include wells
with limited production histories and properties with proved undeveloped
or proved non-producing reserves. In addition, the company’s patented
liquid lift system is generally installed on mature wells. As such, they
contain older down-hole equipment that is more subject to failure than new
equipment. The failure of such equipment, particularly casing, can result
in complete loss of a well. Historically, performance of the company’s
wells has not caused significant revisions in its proved reserves.Price changes will affect the economic lives of oil and gas properties
and, therefore, price changes may cause reserve revisions. Price changes
have not caused significant proved reserve revisions by the company except
in 1986 when a 51% decline in oil prices and a 45% decline in natural gas
prices resulted in an 8.7% reduction in estimated proved reserves. Based
upon this historical experience, the company does not believe its reserve
estimates are particularly sensitive to prices changes within historical
ranges.
One measure of the life of the company’s proved reserves can be
calculated by dividing proved reserves at a fiscal year end by production
for that fiscal year. This measure yields an average reserve life of nine
years. Since this measure is an average, by definition, some of the
company’s properties will have a life shorter than the average and some
will have a life longer than the average. The expected economic lives of
the company’s properties may vary widely depending on, among other
things, the size and quality, natural gas and oil prices, possible
curtailments in consumption by purchasers, and changes in governmental
regulations or taxation. As a result, the company’s actual future net
cash flows from proved reserves could be materially different from its
estimates.
The company is not aware of any material adverse issues related to its
reserves regarding regulatory approval, the availability of additional
development capital, or the installation of additional infrastructure.
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS. SFAS No. 143, Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations requires that the company estimate
the future cost of asset retirement obligations, discount that cost to its
present value, and record a corresponding asset and liability in its
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The values ultimately derived are based on
many significant estimates, including future abandonment costs, inflation,
market risk premiums, useful life, and cost of capital. The nature of
these estimates requires the company to make judgments based on historical
experience and future expectations. Revisions to the estimates may be
required based on such things as changes to cost estimates or the timing
of future cash outlays. Any such changes that result in upward or downward
revisions in the estimated obligation will result in an adjustment to the
related capitalized asset and corresponding liability on a prospective
basis.
REVENUE RECOGNITION . The company derives its revenue
primarily from the sale of produced natural gas and crude oil. The company
reports revenue gross for the amounts received before taking into account
production taxes and transportation costs which are reported as separate
expenses. Revenue is recorded in the month production is delivered to the
purchaser at which time title changes hands. The company makes estimates
of the amount of production delivered to purchasers and the prices it will
receive. The company uses its knowledge of its properties; their
historical performance; the anticipated effect of weather conditions
during the month of production; NYMEX and local spot market prices; and
other factors as the basis for these estimates. Variances between
estimates and the actual amounts received are recorded when payment is
received.
A majority of the company’s sales are made under contractual
arrangements with terms that are considered to be usual and customary in
the oil and gas industry. The contracts are for periods of up to five
years with prices determined based upon a percentage of a pre-determined
and published monthly index price. The terms of these contracts have not
had an effect on how the company recognizes its revenue.
The company’s operating revenue is comprised of contractually based
payments made to the company, as operator, to drill and supervise oil and
gas wells. The company reports these revenues gross for the amounts
received before taking into account related costs which are recorded as
separate expenses. Revenue is recorded in the month it is earned. The
company views providing these services as a way to control the operations
on wells in which it owns an interest.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The company manages exposure to commodity price fluctuations by
periodically hedging a portion of expected production through the use of
derivatives, typically collars and forward short positions in the NYMEX
futures market. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations—Product Prices and Production” for
more information on the company’s hedging activities. The company
currently has no open hedge positions.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The effectiveness of our or any system of disclosure controls and
procedures is subject to certain limitations, including the exercise of
judgment in designing, implementing and evaluating the controls and
procedures, the assumptions used in identifying the likelihood of future
events, and the inability to eliminate misconduct completely. As a result,
there can be no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures will
detect all errors or fraud. By their nature, our or any system of
disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance
regarding management’s control objectives.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we
evaluated the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the “Exchange Act”) as of January 31,
2006. On the basis of this review, our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed, and are effective, to
give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by
us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the SEC and to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. There were no changes in the company’s
internal controls over financial reporting that occurred in the first
fiscal quarter of 2006 that materially affected or were reasonably likely
to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously
disclosed in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended October 31, 2005.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
17
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits are as follow:
| |
31.1 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer under Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
| |
31.2 |
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer under Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
| |
32.1 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350) |
18
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CREDO Petroleum
Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ James T. Huffman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James T. Huffman |
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ David W. Vreeman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Vreeman |
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) |
Date: March 22, 2006
19
Exhibit Index
| |
31.1 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer under Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
| |
31.2 |
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer under Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
| |
32.1 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350) |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, James T. Huffman, Chief Executive Officer of CREDO Petroleum
Corporation, certify that:
| 1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CREDO
Petroleum Corporation; |
| |
| 2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; |
| |
| 3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report; |
| |
| 4. |
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for
causing such controls and procedures to be established and
maintained, for the registrant and have; |
| |
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
| |
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
| |
| |
c) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. |
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s independent
registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function): |
| |
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
| |
| |
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 22, 2006
| |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
|
James T. Huffman
|
|
|
|
|
|
James T. Huffman |
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, David W. Vreeman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CREDO
Petroleum Corporation, certify that:
| 1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CREDO
Petroleum Corporation; |
| |
| 2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; |
| |
| 3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report; |
| |
| 4. |
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for
causing such controls and procedures to be established and
maintained, for the Registrant and have; |
| |
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
| |
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
| |
| |
c) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. |
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s independent
registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function): |
| |
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
| |
| |
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 22, 2006
| |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
|
David W. Vreeman
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Vreeman |
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
CREDO Petroleum Corporation (Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
In connection with this Quarterly Report of CREDO Petroleum Corporation
(the “company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), we, James T. Huffman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the company, and David W. Vreeman, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the company, each hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C., § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:
| 1. |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
| 2. |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the company. |
March 22, 2006
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James T. Huffman
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Vreeman
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CREDO Petroleum
Corporation and will be retained by CREDO Petroleum Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
End of Filing